Connect with us

International

Republicans, Now Critical Of Kamala Harris, Have Targeted Price Gouging In The Past

Published

on

Republicans, Now Critical Of Kamala Harris, Have Targeted Price Gouging In The Past

It didn’t take long after Vice President Kamala Harris announced her plans to address corporate “price gouging” on Friday for Donald Trump to accuse her of proposing Soviet-style communism.

In an apparent reference to Harris’ admittedly vague plan to forbid “price gouging” on food, the former president wrote on Truth Social, “Kamala will implement SOVIET Style Price Controls,” one of several policies he claimed would make inflation “100 times WORSE.”

The Republican National Committee joined in, sharing the New York Post’s Saturday headline “Kamunism” on X with the caption, “Comrade Kamala.”

It is not clear exactly what would count as price gouging under Harris’ proposed federal ban.

But Harris made clear she agrees with those economists who have found that some corporations, rather than merely raising prices in response to a spike in demand relative to existing supply, have taken advantage of market conditions to pad their profits with higher prices. And in select industries, Harris and these economists contend, dominant corporations have found ways to muscle out competition such that there is no natural course-correction mechanism when this price gouging occurs.

What’s more, Harris singled out two industries, beef and pharmaceuticals, that have attracted scrutiny from plenty of Republicans.

In December, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) introduced legislation restricting how pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), a middleman industry that negotiates prescription drug prices for insurance plans, can operate. The bill, which now has the support of 10 Republicans and five Democrats, would require PBMs to charge insurance plans the same amount PBMs reimburse pharmacies, and pass along to insurance plans any discounts they negotiate with pharmacies.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is one of several Republicans who has pushed legislation to crack down on pharmacy benefit managers' and meatpackers' anticompetitive practices.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is one of several Republicans who has pushed legislation to crack down on pharmacy benefit managers’ and meatpackers’ anticompetitive practices. ALLISON BAILEY/Getty Images

Grassley is a longtime critic of PBMs’ and pharmaceutical companies’ pricing practices, going so far as to accuse some companies of price gouging. “As a leading advocate for lowering drug prices in the U.S. Senate, I’ve hauled Big Pharma and pharmacy benefit manager executives before Congress, led a two-year bipartisan investigation into insulin price-gouging, and advanced bipartisan reforms to lower the cost of insulin and many other prescription drugs,” Grassley wrote in an October 2022 op-ed in the Iowa City Press-Citizen.

He sounds a whole lot like Harris, who said on Friday, “I’ll lower the cost of insulin and prescription drugs for everyone with your support, not only our seniors and demand transparency from the middlemen who operate between Big Pharma and the insurance companies, who use opaque practices to raise your drug prices and profit off your need for medicine.”

There are likewise a number of Republican lawmakers who have advocated for federal intervention to stop price gouging in the beef industry. Grassley joined Sens. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) in February 2023 to reintroduce the Meat Packing Special Investigator Act, which would create a new special investigator in the Department of Agriculture to crack down on meatpacking giants’ anticompetitive practices.

The trio argued that concentration in the meatpacking industry, which is now dominated by just four companies, has enabled corporations to at once squeeze independent cattle ranchers with lower purchase prices, and then charge consumers higher and higher prices in supermarkets.

“For years, the gap has widened between the price paid to cattle producers for their high-quality American products and the price of beef at the grocery store,” Rounds said at the time. “Meanwhile, the four largest beef packers, who control 85 percent of our beef processing capacity, have enjoyed record profits. This has resulted in an average of nearly 17,000 cattle ranchers going out of business each year since 1980.”

Harris alluded to similar dynamics when she lamented that the price of “ground beef is up 50%. Many of the big food companies are seeing their highest profits in two decades. And while many grocery chains pass along these savings, others still aren’t.”

“We will help the food industry become more competitive, because I believe competition is the lifeblood of our economy,” she added. “More competition means lower prices for you and your families.”

Some Republicans have even shared Harris’ concern about lack of competition in the supermarket industry.

Alaska Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, both Republicans, wrote to the Federal Trade Commission in September to encourage strict scrutiny of a potential merger between the supermarket conglomerates Kroger and Albertsons.

“The track record of grocery consolidation in our state does not bode well for Alaskans’ food security, affordability, and our dedicated workforce,” the pair wrote.

When the FTC sued to block the merger in February, Murkowski celebrated the decision. “This announcement will come as a relief to countless Alaskans,” she said. “From the potential for even higher grocery prices to longer-term store closures, there were just too many unknowns and uncertainties for this merger to move forward.”

International

Clampdown on fake Google reviews announced

Published

on

By

Google has agreed to make “significant changes to its processes” to help tackle fake reviews of UK businesses, the regulator has announced.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) says the firm – which accounts for 90% of search in the UK – will attach warnings to companies found to have artificially boosted their star rating.
The worst offenders will have their review function deactivated, meaning they cannot receive any new reviews.
Individuals who repeatedly post fake or misleading reviews will be banned from posting – regardless of where they are in the world.
Consumer group Which? called the changes “a step in the right direction” but said they would need to be backed up with strong enforcement action, potentially including “heavy fines” if Google failed to stick to them.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

How an epic series on Asia’s wildlife was filmed

Published

on

By

Filming the BBC’s landmark series Asia took its crew on a four-year-long odyssey from the open ocean to the “roof of the world”.

From frozen mountains to parched deserts, and lush tropical rainforest to vast grassland steppes – Asia is Earth’s largest continent and home to an incredible array of environments.
Perhaps because of that sheer size and variety, until last year the BBC had never devoted a wildlife series entirely to it. The vastness, the crowded megacities and the extreme diversity of environments makes it harder to encapsule in a handful of episodes.
The Natural History Unit’s landmark series Asia took four years to make. “Many parts of Asia are extremely remote, largely unknown, or frequently off-limits,” producer Matthew Wright says. “Its wildlife is less well-studied than that of Africa and the Americas, so we had fewer leads to go on when we started our research.”
“We started by scouring scientific papers, books, websites and social media looking for stories. We spoke to colleagues, conservationists and tour guides too. Once running orders were drawn up, we spent two years and over 2,500 days filming,” said Wright.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

The far-reaching impacts of wildfire smoke – and how to protect yourself

Published

on

By

The air we breathe can have profound effects on our physical and mental health. Is there any way of protecting yourself from this pervasive problem?

All but 1% of the world’s population is exposed to unhealthy air that exceeds World Health Organization (WHO) limits for pollutants. In parts of the world, air quality has rapidly improved through policies that aim to limit pollution. But elsewhere, gains in air quality are at risk of being lost.
More than 25% of the US population is exposed to air considered “unhealthy” by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), according to a report by the climate non-profit First Street Foundation. By 2050, the number of people exposed to “unhealthy” days is set to increase by more than half. The worst days of air pollution (“hazardous” or maroon, under the EPA’s system) are expected to rise by 27%.
Wildfire smoke is one of the factors driving this trend. One study of PM2.5 (see fact box: What is PM2.5?) from wildfire smoke found that levels had increased by up to five micrograms per cubic metre in the western US in the past decade – enough to reverse “decades of policy-driven improvements in overall air quality”, the authors concluded.

Continue Reading

Trending