Business
Apple pushes back on call to end diversity programme
Apple’s board has asked its investors to vote against a proposal to end its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programmes.
It comes after a conservative group, the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR), called on the technology giant to abolish its DEI policies, saying they expose firms to “litigation, reputational and financial risks”.
Apple’s directors say the NCPPR’s proposal is unnecessary because the company has appropriate checks and balances in place.
Other major US firms, including Meta and Amazon, have rolled back DEI programmes ahead of the return to the White House this month of Donald Trump, who has been highly critical of DEI policies.
“The proposal is unnecessary as Apple already has a well-established compliance program,” the firm’s filing to investors said.
Apple’s board also said the DEI rollback plan “inappropriately seeks to micromanage the Company’s programs and policies by suggesting a specific means of legal compliance.”
NCPPR’s proposal is set to be put to a vote by shareholders at Apple’s annual general meeting on 25 February.
Conservative groups have threatened to take legal action against major companies over their DEI programmes, saying such policies are at odds with a Supreme Court decision in 2023 against affirmative action at universities.
Last week, Facebook owner Meta became the latest US company to roll back its DEI initiatives, joining a growing list of major firms that includes Amazon, Walmart and McDonald’s.
In a memo to staff about the decision – which affects, hiring, supplier and training efforts – Meta cited a “shifting legal and policy landscape”.
It also referred to the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling.
Meta’s boss, Mark Zuckerberg, has been moving to reconcile with Trump since his election in November.
The firm has donated $1m (£820,000) to the President-elect’s inauguration fund, hired a Republican as his public affairs chief and announced it is getting rid of fact-checkers on Meta’s social media platforms.
Mr Zuckerberg is not alone among top executives making such moves in the face of mounting pressure from conservative groups.
Business
UK bans cattle, pigs and sheep imports from Germany after foot-and-mouth case
The UK has introduced a ban on pigs, sheep and cattle imports from Germany after a case of foot-and-mouth disease was confirmed in the country.
The government said on Tuesday it will no longer approve health certificates for animals, fresh meat and animal products susceptible to the disease to prevent its spread to the UK where there are currently no confirmed cases.
While there is no risk to humans or food safety, foot-and-mouth is highly contagious in pigs, sheep and cattle, as well as other cloven-hoofed animals.
In 2001 and 2007, the UK suffered major outbreaks of the disease, leading to millions of livestock animals being slaughtered across the country.
Farming minister Daniel Zeichner said the government will do “whatever it takes to protect our nation’s farmers from the risk posed by foot-and-mouth”.
He added: “That is why restrictions have immediately been brought in on animal products from Germany to prevent an outbreak, and we will not hesitate to add additional countries to the list if the disease spreads.
“We will continue to keep the situation under review, working closely with the German authorities.”
Foot-and-mouth disease is a legally notifiable disease, meaning it is an offence not to report a case to the government.
As well as culling animals, farmers affected by the disease could see reduced milk production, as well as wider economic implications such as the loss of access to foreign markets for animals and their subsequent products.
Major outbreaks in 2001 and 2007 cost the public and private sectors billions.
For cattle, symptoms of the disease include blisters and sores on their feet, mouth and tongue, as well as lameness, fever and reluctance to feed.
In sheep and pigs, symptoms typically present as lameness and blisters.
UK Chief Veterinary Officer Dr Christine Middlemiss has asked “livestock keepers to exercise the upmost vigilance for signs of disease, follow scrupulous biosecurity, and report any suspicion of disease immediately to the Animal and Plant Health Agency”.
The government recently announced a £200m investment in the UK’s main research and laboratory testing facilities at Weybridge to bolster protection against animal disease.
Business
Spain plans 100% tax for homes bought by non-EU residents
Spain is planning to impose a tax of up to 100% on the value of properties bought by non-residents from countries outside the EU, such as the UK.
Announcing the move, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the “unprecedented” measure was necessary to meet the country’s housing emergency.
“The West faces a decisive challenge: To not become a society divided into two classes, the rich landlords and poor tenants,” he said.
Non-EU residents bought 27,000 properties in Spain in 2023, he told an economic forum in Madrid, “not to live in” but “to make money from them”.
“Which, in the context of shortage that we are in, [we] obviously cannot allow,” he added.
The move was designed to prioritise available homes for residents, the Spanish prime minister said.
Sánchez did not provide any more details on how the tax would work nor a timeline for presenting it to parliament for approval, where he has often struggled to gather sufficient votes to pass legislation.
His office described the proposed measure as a way to limit the purchase of homes by “non-resident non-EU foreigners”. In Spain, people are classed as non-residents if they live in the country for less than 183 days in a single year.
It added: “The tax burden that they will have to pay in case of purchase will be increased up to 100% of the value of the property, in line with countries such as Denmark and Canada.”
Currently non-residents can be expected to pay 6-10% in tax on the property’s value depending on the region and if the property is new or not.
The Spanish government said the proposal would be finalised “after careful study”.
Business
TikTok users flock to Chinese app RedNote as US ban looms
TikTok users in the US are migrating to a Chinese app called RedNote with the threat of a ban just days away.
The move by users who call themselves “TikTok refugees” has made RedNote the most downloaded app on Apple’s US App Store on Monday.
RedNote is a TikTok competitor popular with young people in China, Taiwan and other Mandarin-speaking populations.
It has about 300 million monthly users and looks like a combination of TikTok and Instagram. It allows users, mostly young urban women, to exchange lifestyle tips from dating to fashion.
Supreme Court justices are due to rule on a law that set a 19 January deadline for TikTok to either sell its US operations or face a ban in the country.
TikTok has repeatedly said that it will not sell its US business and its lawyers have warned that a ban will violate free speech protections for the platform’s 170 million users in the US.
-
Entertainment5 months ago
Earthquake scientists are learning warning signs of ‘The Big One.’ When should they tell the public?
-
International5 months ago
Tarar accuses Imran Khan of conspiring with Faiz Hameed to destabilise Pakistan
-
International3 months ago
PTI Announces Not to Boycott New Committees
-
Business4 months ago
Major Corruption Scandal Uncovered at WASA Multan: Rs1.5 Billion Embezzlement Exposed
-
Business5 months ago
The Impact of QR Codes on Traditional Advertising
-
Business3 months ago
High Court Blocks MDCAT Merit List Amid Controversy Over Exam Error
-
Business5 months ago
The Benefits and Problems of International Trade in the Context of Global Crisis
-
Business4 months ago
Fraud by Pakistani Firm Sparks Outrage in Business Community; Concerns Rise Over International Investment