Business
Huge problems with axing fact-checkers, Meta oversight board says
The co-chair of the independent body that reviews Facebook and Instagram content has said she is “very concerned” about how parent company Meta’s decision to ditch fact-checkers will affect minority groups.
Helle Thorning-Schmidt, from Meta’s oversight board, told the BBC she welcomed aspects of the shake-up, which will see users decide about the accuracy of posts via X-style “community notes”.
However, speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, she said there were “huge problems” with what had been announced, including the potential impact on the LGBTQ+ community, as well as gender and trans rights.
“We are seeing many instances where hate speech can lead to real-life harm, so we will be watching that space very carefully,” she added.
In a video posted alongside a blog post by the company on Tuesday, Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg said the decision was motivated by “getting back to our roots around free expression”.
He said third-party fact-checkers currently used by the firm were “too politically biased”, meaning too many users were being “censored”.
The decision has prompted questions about the survival of the board – which Meta funds and was created by then president of global affairs, Sir Nick Clegg, who announced he was leaving the company less than a week ago.
Ms Thorning-Schmidt – a former prime minister of Denmark – insisted the changes to fact checking meant it was needed more than ever.
“That’s why it is good we have an oversight board that can discuss this in a transparent way with Meta”, she said.
She did welcome some of Meta’s announcement on moderation, including its aim to find a new way to fact-check after there had been instances of “over-enforcement”, with people ending up in “Facebook jail”.
Business
UK bans cattle, pigs and sheep imports from Germany after foot-and-mouth case
The UK has introduced a ban on pigs, sheep and cattle imports from Germany after a case of foot-and-mouth disease was confirmed in the country.
The government said on Tuesday it will no longer approve health certificates for animals, fresh meat and animal products susceptible to the disease to prevent its spread to the UK where there are currently no confirmed cases.
While there is no risk to humans or food safety, foot-and-mouth is highly contagious in pigs, sheep and cattle, as well as other cloven-hoofed animals.
In 2001 and 2007, the UK suffered major outbreaks of the disease, leading to millions of livestock animals being slaughtered across the country.
Farming minister Daniel Zeichner said the government will do “whatever it takes to protect our nation’s farmers from the risk posed by foot-and-mouth”.
He added: “That is why restrictions have immediately been brought in on animal products from Germany to prevent an outbreak, and we will not hesitate to add additional countries to the list if the disease spreads.
“We will continue to keep the situation under review, working closely with the German authorities.”
Foot-and-mouth disease is a legally notifiable disease, meaning it is an offence not to report a case to the government.
As well as culling animals, farmers affected by the disease could see reduced milk production, as well as wider economic implications such as the loss of access to foreign markets for animals and their subsequent products.
Major outbreaks in 2001 and 2007 cost the public and private sectors billions.
For cattle, symptoms of the disease include blisters and sores on their feet, mouth and tongue, as well as lameness, fever and reluctance to feed.
In sheep and pigs, symptoms typically present as lameness and blisters.
UK Chief Veterinary Officer Dr Christine Middlemiss has asked “livestock keepers to exercise the upmost vigilance for signs of disease, follow scrupulous biosecurity, and report any suspicion of disease immediately to the Animal and Plant Health Agency”.
The government recently announced a £200m investment in the UK’s main research and laboratory testing facilities at Weybridge to bolster protection against animal disease.
Business
Spain plans 100% tax for homes bought by non-EU residents
Spain is planning to impose a tax of up to 100% on the value of properties bought by non-residents from countries outside the EU, such as the UK.
Announcing the move, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the “unprecedented” measure was necessary to meet the country’s housing emergency.
“The West faces a decisive challenge: To not become a society divided into two classes, the rich landlords and poor tenants,” he said.
Non-EU residents bought 27,000 properties in Spain in 2023, he told an economic forum in Madrid, “not to live in” but “to make money from them”.
“Which, in the context of shortage that we are in, [we] obviously cannot allow,” he added.
The move was designed to prioritise available homes for residents, the Spanish prime minister said.
Sánchez did not provide any more details on how the tax would work nor a timeline for presenting it to parliament for approval, where he has often struggled to gather sufficient votes to pass legislation.
His office described the proposed measure as a way to limit the purchase of homes by “non-resident non-EU foreigners”. In Spain, people are classed as non-residents if they live in the country for less than 183 days in a single year.
It added: “The tax burden that they will have to pay in case of purchase will be increased up to 100% of the value of the property, in line with countries such as Denmark and Canada.”
Currently non-residents can be expected to pay 6-10% in tax on the property’s value depending on the region and if the property is new or not.
The Spanish government said the proposal would be finalised “after careful study”.
Business
TikTok users flock to Chinese app RedNote as US ban looms
TikTok users in the US are migrating to a Chinese app called RedNote with the threat of a ban just days away.
The move by users who call themselves “TikTok refugees” has made RedNote the most downloaded app on Apple’s US App Store on Monday.
RedNote is a TikTok competitor popular with young people in China, Taiwan and other Mandarin-speaking populations.
It has about 300 million monthly users and looks like a combination of TikTok and Instagram. It allows users, mostly young urban women, to exchange lifestyle tips from dating to fashion.
Supreme Court justices are due to rule on a law that set a 19 January deadline for TikTok to either sell its US operations or face a ban in the country.
TikTok has repeatedly said that it will not sell its US business and its lawyers have warned that a ban will violate free speech protections for the platform’s 170 million users in the US.
-
Entertainment6 months ago
Earthquake scientists are learning warning signs of ‘The Big One.’ When should they tell the public?
-
International6 months ago
Tarar accuses Imran Khan of conspiring with Faiz Hameed to destabilise Pakistan
-
International4 months ago
PTI Announces Not to Boycott New Committees
-
Business4 months ago
Major Corruption Scandal Uncovered at WASA Multan: Rs1.5 Billion Embezzlement Exposed
-
Business5 months ago
The Impact of QR Codes on Traditional Advertising
-
Business3 months ago
High Court Blocks MDCAT Merit List Amid Controversy Over Exam Error
-
Business6 months ago
The Benefits and Problems of International Trade in the Context of Global Crisis
-
Business5 months ago
Fraud by Pakistani Firm Sparks Outrage in Business Community; Concerns Rise Over International Investment