Connect with us

Politics

Historical Lies and Modern Deceptions: A Continual Struggle for Truth”

Published

on

  1. Historical Lies and Modern Deceptions: A Continual Struggle for Truth”

By Imran Ali Khan

Social media is like a “blind man’s foot on a partridge.” In recent days, PTI’s official pages and its supporters have been actively promoting a statement attributed to PPP leader Qamar Zaman Kaira. This statement is supposedly based on a conversation between Kaira and the army chief. A post attributed to Hamid Mir claims, “The watchman is being made a scapegoat in the alleged assault on a student at Punjab College; an important figure is actually responsible.” Another post allegedly from former U.S. President Trump urges, “My Pakistani friend Imran Khan’s life is in danger; step out to save him.” Additionally, a post linked to Raoof Klasra suggests that Imran Khan is being tortured under the supervision of a colonel in jail.

A significant number of people on social media have shared these posts. Notably, the individuals named in these post Hamid Mir, Qamar Zaman Kaira, and Rauf Klasra have denied their association with them.

News about an alleged assault at Punjab College’s Gulberg Girls Campus spread like wildfire, leading to protests in Lahore, Gujrat, and Rawalpindi, some of which turned violent. Initially, rumors circulated that three watchmen were killed by students, but Gujrat police later confirmed the death of a watchman due to student violence.

In one viral video on social media, protesting students are seen taking valuable items from their college, reminiscent of the style of Bangladeshi thieves. Another video shows not only students but also some outsiders engaging in vandalism.

A committee consisting of the Chief Secretary, IG Punjab, and Advocate General Punjab has compiled a report on the incident. According to this report, the alleged assault did not occur, and students were incited through organized fake news and videos. While this incident is telling, a viral video features a woman claiming to be the mother of the alleged victim, detailing the incident. Did the FIA, police, or the three-member committee record her statement? If not, why?

The Chief Justice of Lahore High Court has ordered the formation of a full bench regarding the alleged assault case. Should we expect the court to summon this woman claiming to be the victim’s mother to testify?

We believe the court should also call the student who appeared alongside Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz during her press conference, where she was abruptly silenced when she began to recount the facts. Questions arise about why her microphone was turned off when she was about to reveal the truth.

The preamble has been lengthy, but it was necessary as we discuss four other alleged rape cases that are currently under scrutiny. Those who firmly believe in the truth of these events rely solely on social media posts without any solid evidence. These are the same individuals who question why there was such a significant protest if the incident didn’t occur, why the police resorted to violence, and why arrests are happening.

Several disgraced YouTubers have also contributed to this narrative, some even chanting calls for revolution, particularly figures like Sabir Shakir, Major Raja Adil, and Shaheen Sahbai.

Now, let’s discuss why lies sell more than the truth in our society. Can we start this conversation by referencing Muslim history?

I have a straightforward answer: the history of Muslims, often incorrectly referred to as “Islamic history” in our context, has been cloaked in religious sanctity. Discussing it now feels risky, fearing someone might emerge from the shadows to issue a fatwa for heresy or blasphemy.

I once tasted the repercussions of such a fatwa during an event led by Bilawal Bhutto in my birthplace, thankfully accompanied by friends like Mir Ahmad Kamran Magsi. Otherwise, I would have faced dire consequences for my comments.

Allow me to digress briefly; if we start discussing the arrival of Muslims or Islam in the Indian subcontinent, it would also be intriguing.

For instance, when Hajjaj ibn Yusuf sought permission from the Caliph to invade Sindh, he cited that the ruler Raja Dahir had seized a ship en route to Sri Lanka, holding captive women who wrote to Hajjaj. Thus began the invasion of Sindh. Hajjaj inscribed the Quran, which remains unchanged after 1,300 years, but why didn’t the letters from the women survive?

The lie concocted to justify the invasion of Sindh has persisted for 1,300 years, and those who oppose it face ridicule, often labeled as descendants of Raja Dahir.

Similarly, labeling the rule of the Ghulam, Lodhi, and Mughal dynasties as Islamic regimes is another white lie. This falsehood continues to be propagated through our educational curriculum. The invasions by figures like Mahmud Ghaznavi are mischaracterized as Islamic campaigns. When Mahmud Ghaznavi invaded Multan, an Ismaili Muslim government was in power, and his forces committed massacres and looted, taking thousands of women and young men as slaves to Ghazni for sale.

Referring to the educational institution of Raja Parhalad as a temple of monotheism is yet another falsehood. The partition of the subcontinent occurred over fears that Hindu majorities would infringe on the rights of the Muslim minority. This claim was debunked in April 1947 by Muhammad Ali Jinnah during an interview with American journalists, where he warned, “America should remember that Pakistan, created by partition, will prove to be an ally against the godless Soviet Union.”

This interview exposes the true nature of the partition. The blame for the riots during partition lies with Hindus and Sikhs, another misleading narrative. The riots were initiated by Muslims, leading to the massacres of Hindus and Sikhs in places like Rawalpindi and Lahore’s Shah Alam Market.

For those interested in details about these matters, refer to the works of Husain Haqqani, Muhammad Hafeez Khan, and Kuldeep Nayar.

Among the many lies that have persisted in our political history are claims that the Jamaat-e-Islami participated ideologically in the formation of Pakistan, or that Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan and his family were Indian agents, or that G.M. Syed was a traitor and an enemy of Islam. It’s also claimed that Bhutto’s original name was Ghasiram and that he wasn’t genuinely a Muslim.

Secularism is viewed as godlessness, and its advocates are believed not to trust sacred relationships.

Since the onset of the Zia regime, the creators of fifth-generation warriors have branded democracy and democratic systems with every available insult in the market. Those who perceive the two-party system as against the military establishment’s interests have cultivated a lie that they now must reap.

In short, lies have always been sold in our society with pride. There is much more to say on this topic, but that can wait for another time.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Disasters and extreme weather are making America’s homes even more unaffordable

Published

on

By

Grass fires aren’t out of the ordinary here in the high desert foothills, so Allison Bequette wasn’t terribly surprised when one forced her and other drivers on a detour.

What was striking to her, however, was the sheer intensity and size of the flames. “As tall as a house,” she recalled.

But on this second to last day of 2021, which was yet another in a long line of unseasonably dry ones in the region, hurricane-force winds shot down the mountain and whipped up those flames into a “suburban firestorm,” a deadly, raging inferno that ultimately would consume more than 1,000 houses, a hotel and several other businesses in communities southeast of Boulder.

Bequette’s home of nearly 30 years was among them.

The Marshall Fire caused more than $2 billion in damages, making it the costliest wildfire in Colorado, a state whose purple mountain majesties have long combatted untamed and devastating blazes.

While wildland-urban interface fires account for a small share of fires overall (although are becoming increasingly common), the aftershocks of the Marshall Fire were all too similar to what’s ensued from other disasters and extreme weather events: It not only laid bare existing inequities — it exacerbated them.

Continue Reading

Politics

Electoral College: How it’s changed this year

Published

on

By

More than 150 million Americans cast ballots for president in November, but it’s 538 electors who actually elect the president when they meet in state capitols every four years.

That archaic process, known as the Electoral College, has endured multiple repeal efforts and one very serious attempt to undermine it in 2020.

But the Electoral College survives.

When electors meet on Tuesday, it’s likely to be a much less dramatic affair in 2024 than it was in 2020, simply because President-elect Donald Trump won the election and is not contesting the results. His Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, is also respecting the will of voters this year.

Continue Reading

Politics

Hardline activist who raised the idea of jailing women for abortions gets top policy job in Trump administration

Published

on

By

President-elect Donald Trump has chosen Ed Martin, a hardline, socially conservative activist and commentator, to serve as the next chief of staff at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

As CNN first reported in July, Martin has publicly advocated for a national abortion ban without exceptions for rape or incest and has raised imposing criminal penalties on women and doctors involved in abortions.

Martin is a former chair of the Missouri Republican Party chair and former radio host, and served as one of the leaders of the 2024 Republican National Convention’s platform committee, which shaped the party’s official stance on key issues. He is the current president of socially conservative group Phyllis Schlafly Eagles.

The OMB plays a key role in shaping the president’s economic and legislative agenda by reviewing funding proposals and ensuring they align with the administration’s policy priorities.

Martin’s role at OMB could have a potential impact on how federal funds are allocated for programs related to women’s health or reproductive rights.

CNN first reported Martin’s comments about potentially jailing women for abortions when he was named deputy policy director for the Republican National Convention’s platform committee. Ultimately, at Trump’s request, the platform softened its language on abortion to remove support for a national ban.

A Pew Research Center survey from May 2024 showed that 63% of US adults believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Martin didn’t respond to CNN’s requests for comment on the initial story or this one.

During his radio show in May 2022, Martin repeatedly discussed the prospect of imprisoning women who undergo abortions, stating, “If you believe it’s a baby – I do – then you have to do something to protect the baby.”

Martin has also urged anti-abortion activists to frame the debate in terms of protecting the unborn rather than adopting the framing used by abortion rights advocates about being about a women’s choice.

He argued that if the discussion focuses on a woman’s right to choose, it becomes politically difficult to justify criminal penalties for women who get abortions. However, by shifting the argument to focus on the life of the baby, the possibility of punitive measures for women and doctors becomes open.

“The late Phyllis Schlafly, whom I worked so closely with, used to say, ‘If you get to claim and frame the argument, you almost certainly get to win,’” Martin said. “In other words, if you take their framing, it’s a woman’s right. Are you gonna put women in jail? No. It’s about a baby. Now, what do we do? Frame the argument. Own the argument.”

At the OMB, Martin will report to incoming director Russell Vought, another staunch conservative who previously served in the role during Trump’s first term. Martin and Vought also served together on the platform committee.

In the days after a draft opinion striking down Roe v. Wade was leaked in May 2022, Martin first discussed on his radio show possible prison sentences for women and doctors who perform abortions.

“If you ban abortion in Louisiana, is a doctor who has an abortion breaking the law? Yes. Should he be punished? Yes – I think that seems obvious. What is the punishment? Not sure yet. Could be criminal, could be a jail sentence, I suppose,” he said.

Trump praised Martin in a Truth Social post announcing the selection, writing, “Ed is a winner who will help Make America Great Again!”

Martin has also opposed exceptions for abortions to save the life of the mother, calling it “an absolute scientific fact that no abortion is ever performed to save the life of the mother. None, zero, zilch.”

According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, complications during pregnancy can pose life-threatening risks, sometimes requiring an abortion to preserve the mother’s life. Abortions may be necessary to save the life of the mother suffering from pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia or an ectopic pregnancy.

“The true bane of the pro-life movement is the faction of fake pro-lifers who claim to believe in the sanctity of human life but are only willing to vote that way with a list of exceptions,” Martin said on another radio show in June 2022 – days after Roe v. Wade was struck down.

His hardline views contrast with Trump’s recent efforts to moderate his rhetoric on abortion, as the issue has become politically challenging for Republicans following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Trump has advocated for exceptions in cases of rape, incest, and the health of the mother and said that the issue of abortion should largely be left to the states.

Still, Martin has continued to push for absolute restrictions on abortion, rejecting exceptions of any kind, including, as he said in July 2022, the rape of a 10-year-old Ohio girl.

“Don’t tell me to stop talking about abortion,” Martin said in April 2024 on his radio show. “Don’t tell me that because you don’t think it’s a winner politically, I’m supposed to stop talking about abortion.”

Continue Reading

Trending